Comparative Analysis of Bacterial Isolates for Bioremediation of an Oil-Contaminated Soil

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Soil contamination with petroleum hydrocarbons is a critical environmental challenge, posing significant risks to ecosystems, agricultural productivity, and human health. The widespread release of petroleum compounds through industrial activities, accidental spills, and improper waste disposal has led to the accumulation of persistent and toxic pollutants in soil. Conventional remediation techniques, such as physical and chemical methods (e.g. thermal desorption, and chemical oxidation), often entail high costs, energy consumption, and secondary environmental damage. In contrast, microbial bioremediation has emerged as a sustainable and eco-friendly alternative, leveraging the metabolic capabilities of microorganisms to degrade hydrocarbons into less harmful byproducts. Among hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms, bacterial isolates particularly those from the genera PseudomonasBacillus, and Rhodococcus have demonstrated remarkable efficiency in breaking down complex petroleum compounds. Their enzymatic machinery, including oxygenases and dehydrogenases, enables the catabolism of alkanes, aromatics, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). However, the effectiveness of bioremediation depends on factors such as microbial strain selection, environmental conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, and nutrient availability), and the composition of the contaminant.
 
Methodology
In this study, we evaluated the biodegradation potential of nine bacterial isolates (H921, H814, H712, H711, S21-1, C16-2O, 14A-4, P5, and Bio4) in a soil artificially contaminated with 6.5% petroleum hydrocarbons over a 60-day period. The experiment simulated natural conditions (room temperature) with controlled moisture, aeration (daily stirring), and NPK nutrients supplementation to enhance microbial activity. Key indicators such as reduction in hydrocarbon odor, visible color changes, and residual oil content were monitored to assess degradation efficiency. Hydrocarbon quantification was performed using Soxhlet extraction with diethyl ether, ensuring accurate measurement of residual contamination.
 
Results and Discussion
Preliminary results highlighted strain S21-1 (Pseudomonas sp.) as the most effective, achieving 26% hydrocarbon degradation, followed by 14A-4 and C16-2O. The superior performance of S21-1 was corroborated by its rapid colonization, biosurfactant production, and ability to thrive in hydrocarbon-rich environments. This study underscores the importance of strain-specific selection for optimizing bioremediation strategies and provides a comparative framework for future research on microbial consortia or genetically enhanced strains. By elucidating the degradative capacities of these isolates, we contribute to the development of scalable, low-cost solutions for mitigating petroleum pollution in contaminated soils.
 
Conclusion
Considering the distribution and dispersion of oil pollution in oil-rich regions, especially in the Persian Gulf area, and the prevalence of high temperatures in these regions, this experiment was conducted to investigate certain microbial species tolerant to 50 °C and their potential use in the bioremediation of oil-contaminated soils. Initially, Tween 80 was used to enhance the availability of petroleum compounds for biodegradation, followed by the application of NPK fertilizers and bacterial inoculation at specific intervals, along with maintaining appropriate moisture and active aeration. Analysis of the obtained data on the initial and residual TPH (Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons) levels in the control and bacterial-treated samples indicated that after 60 days, the initial TPH concentration of 6.5% decreased to 4.7%. Among the tested strains, S21-1, belonging to the genus Pseudomonas, exhibited the highest efficiency. GC-FID analysis was not performed on the samples to determine the proportion of aliphatic and aromatic compounds, but it appears that the distribution of these substances in the oil contamination may have been a limiting factor in the biodegradation of petroleum compounds. Alternatively, the tested bacteria may have required more time for the complete biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons. For oil bioremediation projects, obtaining highly efficient bacterial strains is a key factor, and the objective of this research was to achieve such a strain.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization and methodology, M.R.S; Performing experiments and measurements, M.R.S., A.L., and S.H.; formal analysis and data curation, M.R.S., A.L., and S.H.; writing-original draft preparation, M.R.S., writing- review and editing, M.R.S; supervision, M.R.S; project administration, M.R.S; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
Data is available on reasonable request from the authors.
Acknowledgements
This paper is published as a part of a PhDs thesis supported by the Vice Chancellor for Research and Technology of the University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. The authors are thankful to the University of Tabriz for financial supports.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical considerations
The authors avoided data fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and misconduct.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Afsharnia, M., Sarikhani, M. R., & Zarei, M. (2022). Isolation of oil degrading bacteria from oil contaminated soil around the oil refinery and petrochemical plants of Tabriz and identification of the efficient bacteria. Water and Soil Science, 32(4), 91-104. (In Persian with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.22034/ws.2021.45023.2408
Al-Maamary, H. M., Kazem, H. A., & Chaichan, M. T. (2017). Climate change: the game changer in the Gulf Cooperation Council Region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 555-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.048
Al-Maghrabi, I. M., Aqil, A. B., Islam, M. R., & Chaalal, O. (1999). Use of thermophilic bacteria for bioremediation of petroleum contaminants. Energy Sources, 21(1-2), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908319950014920
Anonymous. (1998). Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical Chemical Methods. Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, Washington DC, USA.
Auffret, M. D., Yergeau, E., Labbé, D., Fayolle-Guichard, F., & Greer, C. W. (2015). Importance of Rhodococcus strains in a bacterial consortium degrading a mixture of hydrocarbons, gasoline, and diesel oil additives revealed by metatranscriptomic analysis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 99, 2419-2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6159-8
 Baniasadi, M., & Mousavi, S.M. (2018). A Comprehensive Review on the Bioremediation of Oil Spills. In: Kumar, V., Kumar, M., Prasad, R. (eds) Microbial Action on Hydrocarbons. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1840-5_10
Bouyoucos, G.J. (1951). A recalibration of hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43, 434–438. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300090005x
Ebrahimi, M., Fallah, A. R., & Sarikhani, M. R. (2013). Isolation and identification of oil-degrading bacteria from oil-polluted soils and assessment of their growth in the presence of gas oil. Water and Soil Science, 23(1), 109-121. https://water-soil.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_201.html?lang=en
Ebrahimpour, Gh. & Fooladi, J. (2005). Isolation and characterisation of crude oil biodegrading extreme halophilic biosurfactant-producing bacterium and an examination of the effect of salt concentrations on crude oil biodegradation by this strain. Environmental Sciences, 2(4), 9-20. https://envs.sbu.ac.ir/article_96971.html?lang=fa
Ghavidel, A., Najirad, S., & Alikhani, H. A. (2016). Isolation and study of indigenous bacteria of the contaminated soils in southern of Tehran oil refinery plant for bioremediation of oil contaminations. Water and Soil Science. 26(3), 175-185. https://water-soil.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_5543.html?lang=en
Heydaritabar, R., & Moghimi, H. (2017). Evaluation of anthracene biodegradation by Gliomastix sp. isolated from contaminated soil of Shazand oil refinery, Iran. https://www.sid.ir/paper/250530/fa
Hosseini-Boldaji, S. A., Soltani, H., & Teimouri, M. (2023). Isolation and purification of petroleum-decomposing bacteria from contaminated soils and identification the resulted compounds of degradation of such compounds. Applied Biology, 36(1), 109-34. https://doi.org/10.22051/jab.2022.40410.1486
Jones, J.R. (2001). Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA.
Meintanis, C., Chalkou, K. I., Kormas, K. A., & Karagouni, A. D. (2006). Biodegradation of crude oil by thermophilic bacteria isolated from a volcano island. Biodegradation, 17(2), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-005-6495-6
Martin, A.E., & Reeve, R. (1955). A rapid manometric method for determining soil carbonate. Soil Science, 79, 187–197.
Moradi, Sh., Sarikhani, M. R., Beheshti Ale-Agha, A., Hassanpur, K., & Shiri, J. (2024a). Effects of natural and prolonged crude oil pollution on soil enzyme activities. Geoderma Regional 36 (2024) e00742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2023.e00742
Moradi, Sh., Sarikhani, M. R., Beheshti Ale-Agha, A., Hassanpur, K., & Shiri, J. (2024b). Evaluation of the pattern of changes in basal and substrate-induced respiration in oil-contaminated soils (Case study: Naft-Shahr Kermanshah). Water and Soil Science, 34(1), 163-183. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22034/ws.2023.54206.2502
Nadalian, B., Ebrahimipour, G., & Shahriari Mogadam, M. (2016). Biodegradation of crude oil contamination by a bacterium strain isolated from sediment of Arvandkenar area. Journal of Health, 7(3), 263-275. http://healthjournal.arums.ac.ir/article-1-989-fa.html
Norozpour, M.,  Sarikhani, M. R., & Aliasgharzad, N. (2024). Monitoring of soil enzyme activity changes in a heavy naphtha-contaminated soil under different bioremediation treatments. Water and Soil Science, 34(1), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.22034/ws.2021.48736.2448
Olsen, S.R. & Sommer, L.E. (1982). Phosphorus. Pp. 403–430. In: Page, A.L, Miller, R.H and Keeney, D.R. (Eds). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. SSSA, Madison, WI., USA.
Richard, L.A. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Staff of U. S. Salinity Laboratory, Agriculture Handbook No. 60, USDA, Washington, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195408000-00012
Rich, C. I. (1958). Soil chemical analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 22(3), 272.
Romero-Zerón, L. (Ed.). (2012). Introduction to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes and bioremediation of oil-contaminated sites. BoD–Books on Demand.
Sarikhani, M. R., Afsharnia, M., Zareii, M., & Lotfolahi, A. (2025). Comparison of different bioremediation methods in reducing petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil (Case study: Evaporation ponds of Tabriz refinery). Journal of Soil and Plant Science, 35(2), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.22034/sps.2025.66736.1004
Speight, J. G., & Arjoon, K. K. (2012). Bioremediation of petroleum and petroleum products. John Wiley & Sons.
Thavamani, P., Malik, S., Beer, M., Megharaj, M., & Naidu, R. (2012). Microbial activity and diversity in long-term mixed contaminated soils with respect to polyaromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals. Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.030
Tyagi, M., da Fonseca, M. M. R., & de Carvalho, C. C. (2011). Bioaugmentation and biostimulation strategies to improve the effectiveness of bioremediation processes. Biodegradation22, 231–241.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-010-9394-4
Walkley, A., & Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37 (1), 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003