Spatial Variability of Holtan Soil Infiltration Control Depth Parameter Along Two Toposequences

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.

Abstract

Background and objectives
Infiltration is controlled by i) the water supply rate on the soil surface, ii) soil surface properties and iii) soil profile properties. Where the surface control and flux control are not restrictive, soil profile properties will control the rate of water infiltration. To express infiltration at “profile control” condition, Holtan (1961) developed an empirical model whose parameters have a physical meaning. Many researchers showed that the Holtan model can express reasonably soil infiltration and predicts water storage capacity and the maximum infiltration rate and runoff. In addition, the physical base of Holtan model allows to predict soil infiltration and hence, it provides input data to estimate following processes although, the physical meaning of control depth, or the depth of soil that should be input in model has not been provided reasonably yet. The importance of the top soil thickness in the soil infiltrability and the mechanism of water infiltration in the soil is known, but the value of infiltration control depth is still unclear. Although many attempts have been suggested to define the control depth such as: the depth of the impermeable layer, the thickness of the Ap horizon, depth of water table, very limited studies have been conducted to describe it in real conditions. Since the Holtan model allows the prediction of soil infiltration and this model is highly influenced by control depth parameter therefore, the objectives of this study were: i) to understand how soil infiltration and the control depth factor vary across hillslope transects ii) to link these soil functions to soil basic properties and topographical attributes.
 
Materials and Methods
The study was carried out along two opposite 580 meter hillslopes. At each transect position soil samples were collected and the infiltration experiment was conducted using a double-ring infiltrometer in three repelications. The Holtan infiltration model (1961) was fitted to the experimental data to obtain the control depth of infiltration and other model parameters as well.
 
Results
The results of soil analysis demonstrated a wide range of the physical and chemical properties of the studied soils. The Holtan model was fitted appropriately to the experimental infiltration data across all studied soils and consequently the subject empirical parameters were obtained. The correlation between the Holtan model parameters was statistically insignificant, showing independent variations along the two toposequences, indicating the high flexibility of the model. The range of variations for the infiltration control depth (D) was limited and did not correlated significantly with the thickness of the A horizon, the depth of impermeable layer, nor with soil properties such as sand, silt, and clay content, organic matter, or initial and saturated soil water content. However, in both slopes, the D value decreased from the upper slope, reached its minimum at the backslope, and then increased again in the toeslope. These changes are consistent with the pattern of soil evolution along a toposequence. Although the role of soil surface characteristics on water infiltration in soil has been demonstrated well, in our study the infiltration pattern cannot be attributed to changes in soil surface characteristics and vegetation because, the type of soil surface cover was almost the same at all measurement points. Soil initial conditions (especially initial   water content), influences highly on the water infiltration in the soil, but in the study area, the variation of initial water content were limited and less than 8% moreover, it did not correlate significantly with the control depth, so these two parameters cannot explain soil infiltration along studied toposequences.
 
Conclusion
While it is not possible to attribute the infiltration control depth to a single and easily available soil property, it can be confirmed that an underlying physical interpretation is embedded. Although this value is obtained from model fitting in experimental infiltration studies, it possesses a meaningful physical interpretation beyond that of a purely empirical coefficient. The limited range of variations of D, along with its simultaneous variations with pedological conditions along the two toposequences, indicates that comprehensive, large-scale studies-as well as the development of pedotransfer functions- are required to better understand the physical concept and estimation of this parameter. This finding can help understand eco-hydrological processes in the context of water resources management in dryland ecosystems.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects


Andrieux, P., Voltz, M., Bailly, J. S., Attia, R., & Zante, P. (2025). Predicting the steady-state infiltration rates of agricultural soils of the Mediterranean region from their soil surface conditions. Geoderma461, 117468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117468
Bamutaze, Y., Makooma, T., Gilbert, M., Vanacker, V., Bagoora, F., Magunda, M., Obando, J. and    Wasigeh, J. (2010). Infiltration characteristics of volcanic sloping soils on Mt.Elgon, Eastern Uganda Yazidhi. Catena, 80(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2009.09.006
Basset, C., Abou Najm, M., Angulo‐Jaramillo, R., Bagarello, V., Ghanbarian, B., Prima, S. D & Stewart, R. (2025). Review of conceptual and empirical approaches to characterize infiltration. Vadose Zone Journal, 24(1), e20393. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20393
Basset, C., & Abou Najm, M. (2025). The problem of too many infiltration models: Balancing infiltration model selection and physical meaning of soil hydraulic parameters. Soil and Tillage Research, 252, 106622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106622
Bybordi, M. (2014) Soil Physics. (10th Ed) University of Tehran Press. PP 674. In Persian.
Chen, C., Zou, X., Singh, A. K., Zhu, X., Zhang, W., Yang, B., Jiang, X & Liu, W. (2021). Effects of hillslope position on soil water infiltration and preferential flow in tropical forest in southwest China. Journal of Environmental Management299, 113672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113672
de Almeida, W.S., Panachuki, E., de Oliveira, P.T.S., da Silva Menezes, R., Sobrinho, T.A., and de Carvalho, D. F. (2018). Effect of soil tillage and vegetal cover on soil water infiltration. Soil and Tillage Research, 175, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.07.009
Erdogan, K. A. Y. A. (2013). Spline interpolation techniques. Journal of Technical Science and Technologies, 2(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.31578/jtst.v2i1.56
Frere, M.H., C.A. Onstad, and H.N. Holtan. 1975. ACTMO, an agricultural chemical transport model. ARS-H-3. USDA–ARS, Washington, DC.
Green WH, Ampt CA (1911) Studies on soil physics. I. Flow of air and water through soils. Journal of Agriculture Science 4, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600001441
Guo, X., Guo, X., Li, Y., Zhang, S., & Cheng, J. (2026). A unified fractional-order model for soil infiltration. Journal of Hydrology, 135443. Volume 674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135443
Holtan, H. N. (1961). A concept for infiltration estimates in watershed engineering (Vol. 41). Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.
Holtan, H. N., & Lopez, N. C. (1971). USDAHL-70 model of watershed hydrology (No. 1435). US Department of Agriculture.
Horton RL (1938) The interpretation and application of runoff plot experiments with reference to soil erosion problems. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 3:340–349. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1939.036159950003000C0066x
Huggins, L. F., & Monke, E. J. (1966). The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds (IWRRC Technical Reports, Paper 1). Indiana Water Resources Research Center.
Ju, X., Gao, L., She, D., Jia, Y., Pang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024). Impacts of the soil pore structure on infiltration characteristics at the profile scale in the red soil region. Soil and Tillage Research, 236, 105922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105922
Kostiakov AN (1932) On the dynamics of the co-efficient of water percolation in soils. In: Sixth Commission, International Society of Soil Science, Part A, pp. 15–21.
Kubát, J. F., Strouhal, L., & Kavka, P. (2024). Estimation of infiltration parameters: The role of pedotransfer functions and initial moisture conditions. Journal of Hydrology633, 130954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130954
Lu, S., Liu, M., Yi, J., Yang, Q., & Ding, F. (2025). Preferential flow influences the profile partition patterns of rainwater infiltration in a steep forested headwater catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 661, 133541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.133541
Mallari, K. J. B., Kim, H., Pak, G., Aksoy, H., and Yoon, J. (2015). A comparison of two infiltration models applied to simulation of overland flow over a two-dimensional flume. Water Science and Technology, 71(9), 1325-1331. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.060
Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., & Salvador-Blanes, S. (2008). Quantitative models for pedogenesis—A review. Geoderma144(1-2), 140-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.12.013
Mirzaee, S., Zolfaghari, A. A., Gorji, M., Dyck, M. and Ghorbani Dashtaki, S. (2014). Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 60(5), pp: 681-693. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.823477
Mishra SK, Singh VP (1999) Another look at the SCS-CN method. Journal of Hydrology Engineering, ASCE 4(3):257–264. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(257)
Mishra, S. K., Tyagi, J. V., & Singh, V. P. (2003). Comparison of infiltration models. Hydrological processes, 17(13), 2629-2652. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1257
Mohammadi, M.H. and Refahi, H.G., (2006). Estimation of infiltration through soil physical characteristics. Journal of Iranian Agriculture Science, 36(6), 1391-1398. (In Persian)
Overton, D. (1964). Mathematical refinement of an infiltration equation for watershed engineering. Department of Agricultural Services. Master's Thesis, NTNU.
Parnas, F. E., Abdalla, E. M., & Muthanna, T. M. (2021). Evaluating three commonly used infiltration methods for permeable surfaces in urban areas using the SWMM and STORM. Hydrology Research52(1), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2021.048
Phillip, J.R. (1957). Theory of infiltration. Soil Sciences, 83(5), 345–357.
Rawls, W.J., Ahuja, L.R., Brakensiek, D.L., & Shirmohammadi, A. (1992). Infiltration and soil water movement. In: Maidment D.R. (Ed.), Handbook of  Hydrology. McGraw-Hill Education, USA.
Shahbazi, K., Marzi, M., Mohammadi, M. H., Asadi, H., Fathi-Gerdelidani, A., Hasheminasab Zavareh, K. S., & Cheraghi, M. (2024). Methods of Soil Analysis: Sampling, Chemical and Physical Methods. Soil and Water Research Institute, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian)
 Shao, Q., & Baumgartl, T. (2014). Estimating input parameters for four infiltration models from basic soil, vegetation, and rainfall properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 78(5), 1507-1521. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.04.0122
Shukla, M. K. (2023). Soil physics: An introduction. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429264849
Šimůnek, J., Brunetti, G., Jacques, D., van Genuchten, M. T., & Šejna, M. (2024). Developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages since 2016. Vadose Zone Journal23(4), e20310. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20310
Singh, V. P. (2010), Entropy theory for derivation of infiltration equations. Water Resources Research., 46, W03527. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008193
 Smettem, K. R. J., Rye, C., Henry, D. J., Sochacki, S. J., & Harper, R. J. (2021). Soil water repellency and the five spheres of influence: A review of mechanisms, measurement and ecological implications. Science of the Total Environment, 787, 147429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147429
Soil Survey Staff. (2022). Keys to Soil Taxonomy, 13th Ed. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2001.tb00008.x
Sweeney, K. E., Roering, J. J., & Ellis, C. (2015). Experimental evidence for hillslope control of landscape scale. Science349(6243), 51-53.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab001
Thomas, A. D., Ofosu, A. E., Emmanuel, A., De-Graft, A. J., Ayine, A. G., Asare, A., & Alexander, A. (2020). Comparison and Estimation of Four Infiltration Models. Open Journal of Soil Science, 10(2), 45-57.‏ https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2020.102003
van Schaik, L., Palm, J., Klaus, J., Zehe, E., & Schröder, B. (2014). Linking spatial earthworm distribution to macropore numbers and hydrological effectiveness. Ecohydrology, 7(2), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1358
 Vereecken, H., Amelung, W., Bauke, S. L., Bogena, H., Brüggemann, N., Montzka, C., ... & Zhang, Y. (2022). Soil hydrology in the Earth system. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 3(9), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00324-6
Wei, L., Yang, M., Li, Z., Shao, J., Li, L., Chen, P., ... & Zhao, R. (2022). Experimental investigation of relationship between infiltration rate and soil moisture under rainfall conditions. Water14(9), 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14091347
Xue, D., Tian, J., Zhang, B., Kang, W., & He, C. (2025). Evaluating the effect of vegetation type and topography on infiltration process in an arid mountainous area: Insights from continuous soil moisture monitoring network. Agricultural Water Management315, 109537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109537
Zhang, J., Sun, Q. W., Wen, N., Horton, R., & Liu, G. (2022). Quantifying preferential flows on two farmlands in the North China plain using dual infiltration and dye tracer methods. Geoderma, 428, 116205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116205
 Zhu, Q., Nie, X., Zhou, X., Liao, K., & Li, H. (2014). Soil moisture response to rainfall at different topographic positions along a mixed land-use hillslope. Catena119, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.03.010